Yet More Sexual Insanity
The architects of the sexual revolution have a lot to answer for. Part of the 60s counter-culture revolution, the sexual anarchists did all they could to remake society in their own sordid image. And sadly they have basically succeeded. The levels of sexual insanity seem to be at an all time high.
But scarier yet, there seems to be no end in sight to the perversion and degeneracy. Everywhere we look we see more bitter fruit from the 60s sex revolution. A day does not go by without more examples of how Western societies are committing sexual hara-kiri.
So let me offer you four more recent examples of this. Undoubtedly next week I will have another four or so for you. But these matters must be pointed out, if for no other reason that it might produce a backlash of common sense and moral revulsion. Who knows, maybe this can be turned around if enough folks wake up to this reality.
Let me begin in Europe. Consider this headline: “Sex therapists call for legalisation of ‘virtual’ child porn to ‘relieve paedophiles’ urges’.” The article begins, “Two sex therapists have sparked outrage in the Netherlands by calling for ‘virtual’ child porn to be legalised to relieve the urges of paedophiles.
“Amsterdam hospital sexologists Rik van Lunsen and Erik van Beek claim allowing perverts to view drawings or computer-generated images of children would ‘regulate their desires’. The Netherlands outlawed all sexual representation of children in 2002 as technology made imaginary images too realistic.
“But Mr Van Beek told the Dutch media:’I think that repressing you fantasies can lead to frustration and ultimately, for some types of paedophile, to a greater likelihood of doing something wrong. ‘If you make virtual child pornography under strict government control with a label explaining that no child was abused, you can give paedophiles a way of regulating their sexual urges.’
“Mr van Lunsen added: ‘We don’t make enough of a distinction in public debate between “healthy” paedophiles, people who are not paedosexually active, and delinquent paedosexuals. We’re not responsible for our thoughts or our fantasies, we’re only responsible for one thing – our actions’.”
There you go folks – according to these two sexperts, there are “healthy” paedophiles, and we cannot control what we think about. Yeah right. What planet is this pair living on? But wait, there’s more. Things are not a whole lot better in Britain.
Check out this headline: “Primary school teachers ‘could face sack’ for refusing to promote gay marriage”. As the news item reports: “Liz Truss, an education minister, refused to rule out the possibility that teachers, even in faith schools, could face disciplinary action for objecting on grounds of conscience.
“Miss Truss said simply that it was impossible to know what the impact of the legislation would be at this stage. Her admission came in a letter to a fellow Conservative MP, David Burrowes, last month. Mr Burrowes, a practising Christian, originally wrote to Maria Miller, the equalities minister, raising concerns about the impact on schools of the Coalition’s plans to change the marriage laws.
“It followed the publication of a legal opinion by Aidan O’Neill QC, a barrister in the same London chambers as Cherie Blair, commissioned by the Coalition for Marriage, which campaigns against same-sex unions. Mr O’Neill, an expert on human rights, was asked to advise on the impact redefining marriage to include same-sex couples could have on schools, churches, hospitals, foster carers and public buildings.
“Among his conclusions was that schools could be within their statutory rights to dismiss staff who wilfully fail to use stories or textbooks promoting same-sex weddings. Parents who object to gay marriage being taught to their children would also have no right to withdraw their child from lessons, he argued. And, in theory, the fact that a school was a faith school would make no difference, he added.”
In America things are just as bad it seems. From Washington we get this scary story: “Washington College OK’s Exposure of Young Girls to Transgender Male in Locker Room”. The story goes as follows: “College officials at Washington’s Evergreen College gave approval to a transgender male to expose himself to young girls in the locker room. The college told the young girls to dress behind a curtain if they don’t like it.
“Alliance Defending Freedom reported: Alliance Defending Freedom sent a letter to Washington’s Evergreen State College Thursday after college officials claimed that its non-discrimination policy doesn’t allow the school to stop a man from exposing himself to girls as young as six years old in a women’s locker room. A local district attorney has also stated that he doesn’t plan to enforce the state’s indecent exposure statute to protect the girls.
“The 45-year-old male student, who dresses as a woman and goes by the name Colleen Francis, undressed and exposed his male genitalia on several occasions in the presence of young girls who use the college’s locker rooms. Students from Olympia High School and children in the Evergreen Swim Club and Aquatics Academy share use of the locker rooms with the college. Rather than prevent the man from using the locker room, the school has installed curtains and asked the girls to change behind them.
“‘Little girls should not be exposed to naked men, period. A college’s notions about “non-discrimination” don’t change that,’ said Senior Legal Counsel David Hacker. ‘The idea that the college and the local district attorney will not act to protect young girls is appalling. What Americans are seeing here is the poisoned fruit of so-called “non-discrimination” laws and policies. Placing this man’s proclivities ahead of protecting little girls is beyond unacceptable’.”
And in Maine we learn about this: “Middle Schoolers Subjected To Graphic Gay Indoctrination”. The report states: “Shortly before Maine became one of the first states to approve gay marriage at the ballot box, a school district in the state was ahead of the curve with a presentation of graphic gay sex acts.
“Promoted as part of the school’s ‘Diversity Day’, 25 students in a middle school class were subjected to the filth by a group called Proud Rainbow Youth of Southern Maine. The reprehensible display included advising students about safe homosexual sex acts and suggesting the use of saran wrap during oral sex if a dental dam is not available.
“The mother of one 13-year-old upset by the presentation told the media that the PRYSM speaker also used profanity when spreading the gay-centric message. ‘I’ve had to let him know that no matter what situation he gets in, my suggestion is not saran wrap. My suggestion is to abstain altogether,’ she said.
“School curricula regularly operates outside of parents’ influence, and most children are taught to respect and obey their teachers. It must be incredibly frustrating for the millions of students who hear one view at home and a starkly different opinion in class.
“A spokesperson for Protect Marriage Maine weighed in on the controversial incident, saying this is likely just the tip of the iceberg. ‘If there was any doubt that gay marriage would be taught to young children in Maine schools just as it is in Massachusetts and Canada, that doubt should be removed now,’ he said, adding activists will likely ‘force gay marriage instruction of young children’ now that the state allows such unions.”
Talk about bitter fruit. We have had a half century of the sexual revolution and things are looking pretty ugly. But sadly things have likely not bottomed out yet. Hopefully enough concerned parents and others will stand up and be counted here before the West goes the way of Sodom and Gomorrah.
About this entry
You’re currently reading “Yet More Sexual Insanity”, an entry on CultureWatch
- 20.11.12 / 1pm
- Filed under:
- Article Reviews, Children and Young People, Culture Wars, Education, Homosexuality, Sex Education, Sexuality, Social Issues
- Related posts:
- Related searches: