<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coming Soon to You: The State PC Church</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2009/06/19/1635/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2009/06/19/1635/</link>
	<description>Bill Muehlenberg&#039;s commentary on issues of the day...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:57:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise Le Mottee</title>
		<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2009/06/19/1635/comment-page-1/#comment-144314</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise Le Mottee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/?p=1635#comment-144314</guid>
		<description>So much for &quot;separation of Church and State&quot;!!
Louise Le Mottee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much for &#8220;separation of Church and State&#8221;!!<br />
Louise Le Mottee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alister Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2009/06/19/1635/comment-page-1/#comment-144273</link>
		<dc:creator>Alister Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/?p=1635#comment-144273</guid>
		<description>I have spent my Christian life caught in the cross-fire and tensions between Pente&#039;s and Mainlines, between pedo- and &quot;normal&quot; Baptists, between glosso-maniacs and glosso-phobiacs, between Calvinists and Arminians, etc. I have also done my years for formal Bible training and at the end of it all, I can see no other mature and godly posture than humility.

I hear it echoed in Murray&#039;s reply to Roger but completely absent in both Roger&#039;s comments. What I hear in Roger&#039;s comments is, &quot;I have all the answers.&quot; Further, I heard a distinct voice of accusation towards Australian church leaders that none of them had done good enough.

To quote: &quot;...by comparison the Australian church does not exist.&quot;

Well, thank you VERY much, on behalf of all the sincere and hard working church leaders that I know and deeply respect.

Alister Cameron, Melbourne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have spent my Christian life caught in the cross-fire and tensions between Pente&#8217;s and Mainlines, between pedo- and &#8220;normal&#8221; Baptists, between glosso-maniacs and glosso-phobiacs, between Calvinists and Arminians, etc. I have also done my years for formal Bible training and at the end of it all, I can see no other mature and godly posture than humility.</p>
<p>I hear it echoed in Murray&#8217;s reply to Roger but completely absent in both Roger&#8217;s comments. What I hear in Roger&#8217;s comments is, &#8220;I have all the answers.&#8221; Further, I heard a distinct voice of accusation towards Australian church leaders that none of them had done good enough.</p>
<p>To quote: &#8220;&#8230;by comparison the Australian church does not exist.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, thank you VERY much, on behalf of all the sincere and hard working church leaders that I know and deeply respect.</p>
<p>Alister Cameron, Melbourne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2009/06/19/1635/comment-page-1/#comment-144238</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/?p=1635#comment-144238</guid>
		<description>Some good thoughts there Bill.
Just like to add though that the Spotless Bride is both here already, the Church.  Obviously we need to actualise through being aware of Christ&#039;s call and living out what Christ has given to us first as a free gift.

Firm preaching that&#039;s true however, the other part of worship is the Eucharist: where the focus is on Christ and not on the Minister.
When church services become noisy and the focus is on the &#039;preacher man&#039; and the homily/sermon is about himself or on topics not related to that day&#039;s Scripture readings, then that is where we get &#039;gurus&#039;- and that is how we in the congregation miss out on Christ and why I think people leave for other parishes; or more tragically, if weak in the Faith, leave for good.
Michael Webb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some good thoughts there Bill.<br />
Just like to add though that the Spotless Bride is both here already, the Church.  Obviously we need to actualise through being aware of Christ&#8217;s call and living out what Christ has given to us first as a free gift.</p>
<p>Firm preaching that&#8217;s true however, the other part of worship is the Eucharist: where the focus is on Christ and not on the Minister.<br />
When church services become noisy and the focus is on the &#8216;preacher man&#8217; and the homily/sermon is about himself or on topics not related to that day&#8217;s Scripture readings, then that is where we get &#8216;gurus&#8217;- and that is how we in the congregation miss out on Christ and why I think people leave for other parishes; or more tragically, if weak in the Faith, leave for good.<br />
Michael Webb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Muehlenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2009/06/19/1635/comment-page-1/#comment-144232</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Muehlenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/?p=1635#comment-144232</guid>
		<description>Thanks guys

I do not mind this particular thread continuing as long as it stays polite and respectful. Important issues arise here. It seems three things can be said with a fair amount of certainty:

One, there are certainly plenty of churches who are letting down the gospel, seemingly more interested in entertainment, celebrity leadership, numbers and being popular than preaching the firm word about discipleship, counting the cost, denying self, and so on.

Two, there are also plenty of really good pastors and churches out there working their tails off, seeking to faithfully represent Christ aright. Many of them of course never are in the spotlight, do not get much attention, but they are doing great things for the Kingdom.

Three, God will build his church. The amazing thing is, despite all the shortcomings and screw-ups by us, he is preparing a spotless bride for himself. This is an absolutely incredible concept to think about.

Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys</p>
<p>I do not mind this particular thread continuing as long as it stays polite and respectful. Important issues arise here. It seems three things can be said with a fair amount of certainty:</p>
<p>One, there are certainly plenty of churches who are letting down the gospel, seemingly more interested in entertainment, celebrity leadership, numbers and being popular than preaching the firm word about discipleship, counting the cost, denying self, and so on.</p>
<p>Two, there are also plenty of really good pastors and churches out there working their tails off, seeking to faithfully represent Christ aright. Many of them of course never are in the spotlight, do not get much attention, but they are doing great things for the Kingdom.</p>
<p>Three, God will build his church. The amazing thing is, despite all the shortcomings and screw-ups by us, he is preparing a spotless bride for himself. This is an absolutely incredible concept to think about.</p>
<p>Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray Adamthwaite</title>
		<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2009/06/19/1635/comment-page-1/#comment-144229</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray Adamthwaite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/?p=1635#comment-144229</guid>
		<description>Emily,
I am not attacking my brother Roger. I only ask him to face the fact of 20 centuries of Christian history, and that because of that we do not live in a theological vacuum. If you see an &quot;undercurrent of blame&quot; here, I can only express my bewilderment. No such &quot;blame&quot; is either intended or overtly expressed.
Murray Adamthwaite</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emily,<br />
I am not attacking my brother Roger. I only ask him to face the fact of 20 centuries of Christian history, and that because of that we do not live in a theological vacuum. If you see an &#8220;undercurrent of blame&#8221; here, I can only express my bewilderment. No such &#8220;blame&#8221; is either intended or overtly expressed.<br />
Murray Adamthwaite</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2009/06/19/1635/comment-page-1/#comment-144227</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/?p=1635#comment-144227</guid>
		<description>Why is it that at the end of this, brothers and sisters in Christ are attacking and defending against each other? Why is there this under-current of blame circulating through these messages?

Mark 3:24 ~ If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.

Romans 15:1 ~ We who are strong ought to bear with the failings of the weak and not to please ourselves.

The true NT church is obedience to Christ. Even between us, God is the final judge at the end.

Emily Chen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that at the end of this, brothers and sisters in Christ are attacking and defending against each other? Why is there this under-current of blame circulating through these messages?</p>
<p>Mark 3:24 ~ If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.</p>
<p>Romans 15:1 ~ We who are strong ought to bear with the failings of the weak and not to please ourselves.</p>
<p>The true NT church is obedience to Christ. Even between us, God is the final judge at the end.</p>
<p>Emily Chen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray Adamthwaite</title>
		<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2009/06/19/1635/comment-page-1/#comment-144193</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray Adamthwaite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 06:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/?p=1635#comment-144193</guid>
		<description>&quot;to start a new expression of church based on the New Testament&quot;

Roger, is this new church to be Calvinist or Arminian? Baptist or paedobaptist? Independent or Presbyterian? Pre-, post-, or Amillennial? Will it have a pastor, or elders only? Or perhaps a pastor plus deacons? What moral stance will it take on e.g. divorce, pre-marital sex, alcohol consumption, theatre-going, modern Bible versions, and a host of other matters? IOW, many new ventures have claimed to be &quot;the New Testament pattern&quot;, but have usually fallen into one historic groove or another, despite the best of intentions. Everyone and his proverbial dog claim to follow &quot;just the Bible&quot;, even (most especially) the cults, but evaluation of such claims is just a little more difficult. 
After 20 centuries of Christian history, the only honest thing to do is admit that in starting a new church, you openly state that in following Scripture, you also adopt a certain set of historic distinctives, as set out in a doctrinal statement or confession of faith, the function of which is to state how your group understands Scripture, and what they see Scripture as teaching on the above issues, and a host of others.
Murray Adamthwaite</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;to start a new expression of church based on the New Testament&#8221;</p>
<p>Roger, is this new church to be Calvinist or Arminian? Baptist or paedobaptist? Independent or Presbyterian? Pre-, post-, or Amillennial? Will it have a pastor, or elders only? Or perhaps a pastor plus deacons? What moral stance will it take on e.g. divorce, pre-marital sex, alcohol consumption, theatre-going, modern Bible versions, and a host of other matters? IOW, many new ventures have claimed to be &#8220;the New Testament pattern&#8221;, but have usually fallen into one historic groove or another, despite the best of intentions. Everyone and his proverbial dog claim to follow &#8220;just the Bible&#8221;, even (most especially) the cults, but evaluation of such claims is just a little more difficult.<br />
After 20 centuries of Christian history, the only honest thing to do is admit that in starting a new church, you openly state that in following Scripture, you also adopt a certain set of historic distinctives, as set out in a doctrinal statement or confession of faith, the function of which is to state how your group understands Scripture, and what they see Scripture as teaching on the above issues, and a host of others.<br />
Murray Adamthwaite</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2009/06/19/1635/comment-page-1/#comment-144178</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/?p=1635#comment-144178</guid>
		<description>Robert, I have always held you in high esteem so it does not surpise me you were prepared to tackle the subject. Perhaps you should take the message onto the road around the churches and save them from their &quot;come and be blessed, we will make you happy&quot; syndrome. 

Alister, I am disappointed that you make uninformed remarks without producing any evidence for your accusations. Oh, in case you are wondering, I do forgive you for your crass attack on me.  

For your information I have been around...the world, and my involvement with the church has been with the house church movement, mega churches, small country churches, various denominations and as leader of para church ministries. In addition I have a theological degree and three university degrees. In England, God used me with a handful of others to bring revival to the church we were in, and I was a member of another church that was in revival for 30 years. What else do you want me to do to show that I have been around?

The only thing that has stopped me starting my own is God&#039;s approval to do so. I have that now so I have made myself available to him to start a new expression of church based on the New Testament. It will be &quot;his&quot; church, not mine and the Holy Spirit will be in charge, not me. 

It could not happen before now because I had to go through a lot of sifting of my motives and to ensure that God is the only one who is going to get the glory and to make sure I was dead in Christ to ensure that I was not offering God my ability but my availability.

Roger Marks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, I have always held you in high esteem so it does not surpise me you were prepared to tackle the subject. Perhaps you should take the message onto the road around the churches and save them from their &#8220;come and be blessed, we will make you happy&#8221; syndrome. </p>
<p>Alister, I am disappointed that you make uninformed remarks without producing any evidence for your accusations. Oh, in case you are wondering, I do forgive you for your crass attack on me.  </p>
<p>For your information I have been around&#8230;the world, and my involvement with the church has been with the house church movement, mega churches, small country churches, various denominations and as leader of para church ministries. In addition I have a theological degree and three university degrees. In England, God used me with a handful of others to bring revival to the church we were in, and I was a member of another church that was in revival for 30 years. What else do you want me to do to show that I have been around?</p>
<p>The only thing that has stopped me starting my own is God&#8217;s approval to do so. I have that now so I have made myself available to him to start a new expression of church based on the New Testament. It will be &#8220;his&#8221; church, not mine and the Holy Spirit will be in charge, not me. </p>
<p>It could not happen before now because I had to go through a lot of sifting of my motives and to ensure that God is the only one who is going to get the glory and to make sure I was dead in Christ to ensure that I was not offering God my ability but my availability.</p>
<p>Roger Marks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Fishley</title>
		<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2009/06/19/1635/comment-page-1/#comment-144167</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Fishley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/?p=1635#comment-144167</guid>
		<description>The Mainline Churches tend to be controlled by the &#039;Spirit of This Age&#039;; consequently, they are on side with the &#039;Politically Correct&#039;. This is not new, e.g., Nazi Germany - see &quot;The Third Reich in Power&quot; by Richard J. Evans, 2005.
Stan Fishley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mainline Churches tend to be controlled by the &#8216;Spirit of This Age&#8217;; consequently, they are on side with the &#8216;Politically Correct&#8217;. This is not new, e.g., Nazi Germany &#8211; see &#8220;The Third Reich in Power&#8221; by Richard J. Evans, 2005.<br />
Stan Fishley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Bellet</title>
		<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2009/06/19/1635/comment-page-1/#comment-144156</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Bellet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/?p=1635#comment-144156</guid>
		<description>For quite some time, the tactics used by the enemies of Christianity have become so obvious that even Frederick the sightless one should have seen through them. 
Many politicians should be included in our list of our enemies.  These types have next to no talent in running the economy efficiently, but are overloaded with rat cunning, in being able to fool a bit more than half the population in voting for them. 
Once in power, either as a government or a supporter on the sidelines, they offer advice and &quot;solutions&quot;  for the community for imaginery problems, dressed up as honourable benefits. However, what they propose has the exact opposite effect. Religious vilification laws is a shining example.
Helped by the media,either through overt support or the equally evil &quot;silence&quot; they manage to bully much of the community into believing that what they propose is holy writ. 
They use language, which is the opposite to what they mean. They talk about being pro-choice, when in fact they are pro-abortion, with no choice to anyone who comes within cooee of an abortionist. They attempt to make everone feel guilty with their current grand hoax of &quot;Climate Change&quot; nee &quot;Global Warming&quot;, which is a form of undisguised pantheism. 
Where is this talent for evil, which is growing like a cancer in our society, coming from? It&#039;s coming from their rat cunning adviser Satan. 
The possible solution -we have to stand up to politicians who attempt to implement evil and show support for those who support our standards, but first of all, prayer is needed- lots of it.
Frank Beiiet, Petrie Qld</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For quite some time, the tactics used by the enemies of Christianity have become so obvious that even Frederick the sightless one should have seen through them.<br />
Many politicians should be included in our list of our enemies.  These types have next to no talent in running the economy efficiently, but are overloaded with rat cunning, in being able to fool a bit more than half the population in voting for them.<br />
Once in power, either as a government or a supporter on the sidelines, they offer advice and &#8220;solutions&#8221;  for the community for imaginery problems, dressed up as honourable benefits. However, what they propose has the exact opposite effect. Religious vilification laws is a shining example.<br />
Helped by the media,either through overt support or the equally evil &#8220;silence&#8221; they manage to bully much of the community into believing that what they propose is holy writ.<br />
They use language, which is the opposite to what they mean. They talk about being pro-choice, when in fact they are pro-abortion, with no choice to anyone who comes within cooee of an abortionist. They attempt to make everone feel guilty with their current grand hoax of &#8220;Climate Change&#8221; nee &#8220;Global Warming&#8221;, which is a form of undisguised pantheism.<br />
Where is this talent for evil, which is growing like a cancer in our society, coming from? It&#8217;s coming from their rat cunning adviser Satan.<br />
The possible solution -we have to stand up to politicians who attempt to implement evil and show support for those who support our standards, but first of all, prayer is needed- lots of it.<br />
Frank Beiiet, Petrie Qld</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

