<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A review of The Shack. By William Young. Part One.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2008/04/11/a-review-of-the-shack-by-william-young-part-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2008/04/11/a-review-of-the-shack-by-william-young-part-one/</link>
	<description>Bill Muehlenberg's commentary on issues of the day...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:23:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hutton, Ariah Park</title>
		<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2008/04/11/a-review-of-the-shack-by-william-young-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-135530</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hutton, Ariah Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2008/04/11/a-review-of-the-shack-by-william-young-part-one/#comment-135530</guid>
		<description>Bill,

Because Young consistently pushes his reader away from the Scriptures and the Church (and theology as you note) I could not be as positive about the book.

If you use fiction/literature to shake someone&#039;s ideas and then send them to find answers in Scripture, all well and good. But when you consistently deride the church of Christ and malign the Scriptures as authoritative, where does your fiction send people for answers?

It seems to me that Young reflects more the spirit of the age than any strong Christian understanding.

Michael Hutton, Ariah Park, NSW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>Because Young consistently pushes his reader away from the Scriptures and the Church (and theology as you note) I could not be as positive about the book.</p>
<p>If you use fiction/literature to shake someone&#8217;s ideas and then send them to find answers in Scripture, all well and good. But when you consistently deride the church of Christ and malign the Scriptures as authoritative, where does your fiction send people for answers?</p>
<p>It seems to me that Young reflects more the spirit of the age than any strong Christian understanding.</p>
<p>Michael Hutton, Ariah Park, NSW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince Caporale</title>
		<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2008/04/11/a-review-of-the-shack-by-william-young-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-132133</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince Caporale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 06:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2008/04/11/a-review-of-the-shack-by-william-young-part-one/#comment-132133</guid>
		<description>I just finished this novel as my own personal choice in my Literature English class, and might I say that I completely agree with your persepective and critique on the story.  You helped me with my Annotated Bibliography and now have a more clear personal understanding!
Thanks :)

Vince Caporale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished this novel as my own personal choice in my Literature English class, and might I say that I completely agree with your persepective and critique on the story.  You helped me with my Annotated Bibliography and now have a more clear personal understanding!<br />
Thanks <img src='http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Vince Caporale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
