<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Gore and Greenhouse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2006/09/13/more-on-gore-and-greenhouse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2006/09/13/more-on-gore-and-greenhouse/</link>
	<description>Bill Muehlenberg&#039;s commentary on issues of the day...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:27:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan</title>
		<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2006/09/13/more-on-gore-and-greenhouse/comment-page-1/#comment-4182</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2006/09/13/more-on-gore-and-greenhouse/#comment-4182</guid>
		<description>Just like with evolution, a great deal of the GW scaremongering relies heavily upon uniformitarian assumptions about the history of the earth&#039;s climate. See for example the &#039;answers&#039; to questions 3&amp;4 in this Federal government document:
http://www.greenhouse.gov.au/science/qa/pubs/science-qa.pdf

Ewan McDonald, Victoria</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like with evolution, a great deal of the GW scaremongering relies heavily upon uniformitarian assumptions about the history of the earth&#8217;s climate. See for example the &#8216;answers&#8217; to questions 3&amp;4 in this Federal government document:<br />
<a href="http://www.greenhouse.gov.au/science/qa/pubs/science-qa.pdf" rel="nofollow">www.greenhouse.gov.au/science/qa/pubs/science-qa.pdf</a></p>
<p>Ewan McDonald, Victoria</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Werps, Melbourne</title>
		<link>http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2006/09/13/more-on-gore-and-greenhouse/comment-page-1/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Werps, Melbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2006/09/13/more-on-gore-and-greenhouse/#comment-686</guid>
		<description>Totally agree with you Bill and Andrew.

Because global warming creates fear in many people it has become a favourite social discussion topic.
Only this week over lunch in a group of 12 everyone was in agreement bar me, that global warming is a real issue.

The ones who push this theory upon us have very little faith in God given human ingenuity and inventiveness to solve problems and crisis.

A projected future crisis will always bring out the best in some of us. That is exactly what the free enterprise capitalist world thrives on. Identify the problem, create a solution and sell it!

For instance one of the alarmist&#039;s cries is that we are running out of oil soon (again).
For those of us old enough to remember, we were told exactly that in the early seventies, over thirty years ago!
At one stage the concern was so great, that in Europe petrol was rationed during the week and nobody was allowed to drive on sundays for a while.

Since then, cars have become much more fuel efficient. There are hybrid cars on the market, alternative energy engines such as hydrogen are not too far away etc. etc.

More often than not, the alarmists are evolutionsts and can not agree amongst themselves how old the worls is.
Every nature documentary on tv has a different take on it. According to them, the age of the world ranges between the millions and billions of years. Which is it ?
The evolutionists have no definitive age for the world, it is always a range that is given.

And now they want to tell us that we will see temperature rises within the next 100 years, sufficient to flood large parts of the world. What&#039;s the hurry with quoting disaster within a hundred years if you can&#039;t agree on a few million?

The alarmists wouldn&#039;t have high altitude real estate interests now then would they?

By all means let us look after this planet, but stop your fear mongering.

Erik Werps, Melbourne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree with you Bill and Andrew.</p>
<p>Because global warming creates fear in many people it has become a favourite social discussion topic.<br />
Only this week over lunch in a group of 12 everyone was in agreement bar me, that global warming is a real issue.</p>
<p>The ones who push this theory upon us have very little faith in God given human ingenuity and inventiveness to solve problems and crisis.</p>
<p>A projected future crisis will always bring out the best in some of us. That is exactly what the free enterprise capitalist world thrives on. Identify the problem, create a solution and sell it!</p>
<p>For instance one of the alarmist&#8217;s cries is that we are running out of oil soon (again).<br />
For those of us old enough to remember, we were told exactly that in the early seventies, over thirty years ago!<br />
At one stage the concern was so great, that in Europe petrol was rationed during the week and nobody was allowed to drive on sundays for a while.</p>
<p>Since then, cars have become much more fuel efficient. There are hybrid cars on the market, alternative energy engines such as hydrogen are not too far away etc. etc.</p>
<p>More often than not, the alarmists are evolutionsts and can not agree amongst themselves how old the worls is.<br />
Every nature documentary on tv has a different take on it. According to them, the age of the world ranges between the millions and billions of years. Which is it ?<br />
The evolutionists have no definitive age for the world, it is always a range that is given.</p>
<p>And now they want to tell us that we will see temperature rises within the next 100 years, sufficient to flood large parts of the world. What&#8217;s the hurry with quoting disaster within a hundred years if you can&#8217;t agree on a few million?</p>
<p>The alarmists wouldn&#8217;t have high altitude real estate interests now then would they?</p>
<p>By all means let us look after this planet, but stop your fear mongering.</p>
<p>Erik Werps, Melbourne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

